Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)

From: Mimi Zohar <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:02:14 -0400

[Cc'ing David Howells]

On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 11:35 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry.
> > 
> > Changes since 20190625:
> > 
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> 11 warnings like this one (in a randconfig build):
> 
>   CC      security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
> In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
>                  from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: ‘struct key_acl’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>            struct key_acl *acl)
>                   ^
> ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]

David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled,
but the stub functions are not.  There's now a dependency on
key_acl().

Mimi