public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail•com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:21:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806060421y5ec0a4f7je592f6ba5b575ee4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080606035413.37f340ef.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation•org> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 02:48:11 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org> wrote:

...

> commit a9ad585c8a18f7ba754b85f5786976609b9d7d29
> Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi•com>
> Date:   Mon May 12 21:21:12 2008 +0200
>
>    x86: remove the static 256k node_to_cpumask_map
>
>      * Consolidate node_to_cpumask operations and remove the 256k
>        byte node_to_cpumask_map.  This is done by allocating the
>        node_to_cpumask_map array after the number of possible nodes
>        (nr_node_ids) is known.
>
>      * Debug printouts when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is active have
>        been increased.  It now shows faults when calling node_to_cpumask()
>        and node_to_cpumask_ptr().

This might be obvious, but maybe enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
will give you some more (valuable) info? It looks to me like maybe
nr_node_ids is returning inconsistent numbers or used somewhere before
it's properly initialized.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-06 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-05  7:52 linux-next: Tree for June 5 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06  2:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  3:46   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  7:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  7:25     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  7:33       ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  7:41         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  7:47           ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  7:53             ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06  8:01               ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  8:22                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06  8:30                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  8:36                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 11:50                     ` Paul Mackerras
2008-06-06  8:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  8:23             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  8:28               ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06  8:33                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  8:38               ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  8:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  9:01                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 10:47                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 16:37                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  7:29     ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  9:48       ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06  9:54         ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 10:10           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 10:54         ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 11:21           ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2008-06-06 11:57           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 12:33             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 13:33               ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 13:50                 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:07                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:20                     ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:36                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:41                         ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:51                           ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:54                             ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:57                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:01                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:13                             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 15:23                               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:52                                 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-18  8:26                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:04                           ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 15:20                             ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 15:33                               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:13                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 14:13                   ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 13:28           ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 17:15           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06  7:33     ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-05  6:41 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19f34abd0806060421y5ec0a4f7je592f6ba5b575ee4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vegard.nossum@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox