Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 23

From: "Vegard Nossum" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:02:29 +0200

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Vegard Nossum <[email-masked]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Vegard Nossum <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED
>> Testing tracer sysprof: PASSED
>> Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED
>> Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED
>> Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
>> Testing tracer preemptoff: PASSED
>> Testing tracer preemptirqsoff: <4>------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2680 check_flags+0x142/0x160()
>> Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.26-rc6-next-20080620 #34
>
> <-- Oops, wrong version :-(
>
> Will try the latest one as well.

Okay, I can confirm that this happens with today's tree too. I also
get this (new) warning:

mm/slub.c: In function 'kmem_cache_defrag':
mm/slub.c:3046: warning: 'reclaimed' may be used uninitialized in this function

Otherwise things seem to work good :-)

Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036