public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the apparmor tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:27:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c8c926f-5c21-1565-6687-f473400dc065@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712132339.383219ad@canb.auug.org.au>

On 7/11/22 20:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the apparmor tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from security/apparmor/include/policy.h:29,
>                   from security/apparmor/include/policy_ns.h:19,
>                   from security/apparmor/include/cred.h:19,
>                   from security/apparmor/net.c:13:
> security/apparmor/net.c: In function 'aa_label_sk_perm':
> security/apparmor/net.c:148:40: error: 'sock' undeclared (first use in this function)
>    148 |         struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sock->sk);
>        |                                        ^~~~
> security/apparmor/include/net.h:54:21: note: in definition of macro 'SK_CTX'
>     54 | #define SK_CTX(X) ((X)->sk_security)
>        |                     ^
> security/apparmor/net.c:148:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    148 |         struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sock->sk);
>        |                                        ^~~~
> security/apparmor/include/net.h:54:21: note: in definition of macro 'SK_CTX'
>     54 | #define SK_CTX(X) ((X)->sk_security)
>        |                     ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>    6ff81169592d ("apparmor: add a kernel label to use on kernel objects")
> 
> I have used the apparmor tree from next-20220711 for today.
> 
sorry, the offending patch has been dropped


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-12  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12  3:23 linux-next: build failure after merge of the apparmor tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-12  4:27 ` John Johansen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-02 14:46 Mark Brown
2025-03-26  4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-26 11:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-26 16:19   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-03-26 16:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-08  7:33 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1c8c926f-5c21-1565-6687-f473400dc065@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox