Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:33:40 +1000

Hi Pierre,

On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Pierre Ossman <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
> for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.

What it allows me to do, though, is drop your "next" tree if things go
really bad without dropping fixes for Linus' current tree that you deem
necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/