Subject: Re: tty changes in (I assume) Greg's tree

From: Andrew Morton <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:02:29 -0700

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:52:06 -0700 Greg KH <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 77-tty-break-errorhandler
> > 69-tty-split-ldisc
> > 22-more-tty_port-fields
> > etc
> > 
> > aren't terribly good patch titles.  Were they merged up incorrectly?
> 
> Heh, that's alan's tree, not mine :)

<looks>

OK, it's a quilt tree at http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/ttydev/

And it tries to get it right.  For example,
http://www.linux.org.uk/~alan/ttydev/77-tty-break-errorhandler has

  tty: rework break handling
  
  From: Alan Cox <[email-masked]>
  
  Some hardware needs to do break handling itself and may have partial
  support only. Make break_ctl return an error code. Add a tty driver flag
  so you can indicate driver hardware side break support.

  Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[email-masked]>

But I assume that Stephen's scripts did not behave as desired.

(It's strange that there are two patches prefixed "77-", and many
similar)