Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 11

From: Arjan van de Ven <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:31:49 -0700

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:21:38 +0200
"Vegard Nossum" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> >  [<ffffffff8023d37f>] warn_on_slowpath+0x5f/0x80
> >  [<ffffffff80220030>] ? hpet_unregister_irq_handler+0x0/0x30
> >  [<ffffffff8022a8ae>] ? kmemcheck_mark_initialized+0xe/0x10
> >  [<ffffffff802b97fb>] ? kmemcheck_slab_alloc+0x2b/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff802b8610>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xc0/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff80291921>] ? mempool_alloc_slab+0x11/0x20
> >  [<ffffffff80291a8b>] ? mempool_alloc+0x5b/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff803575db>] blk_plug_device+0x9b/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffff80453d9f>] bitmap_startwrite+0xbf/0x1b0
> >  [<ffffffff802e87e4>] ? bio_alloc_bioset+0x54/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffffa004eafa>] make_request+0x39a/0x810 [raid1]
> >  [<ffffffff80291a8b>] ? mempool_alloc+0x5b/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff80291a8b>] ? mempool_alloc+0x5b/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff8035682d>] generic_make_request+0x17d/0x2b0
> >  [<ffffffff803581dc>] submit_bio+0x6c/0xf0
> Hm, even though there's kmemcheck in the stacktrace, I think it's
> unrelated. Probably it's just a call that returned and the addresses
> were left on the stack. 

more than "probably".. that's what the "?" in the trace is for ;)