Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree

From: Ingo Molnar <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:58:00 +0200

* Pekka Enberg <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 09:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > (This would be doable and pretty painless as long as slab.git is
> > purely append-only and not rebased.)
> 
> Heh, it's not, as I never quite understood the workflow for that. But 
> that's another discussion, I suppose.

what's your current workflow, what causes the sha1's for commits to 
change frequently? Do you work with patches (i.e. it's not really a Git 
workflow at all and you regenerate the git tree all the time you export 
it from your patch queue), or do you perhaps git-rebase often to clean 
up patches?

	Ingo