From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
eranian@gmail•com, linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack•com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel•org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello•nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the perfmon3 tree
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126071650.GE26036@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18732.62831.286805.400379@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
* Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
>
> > We know and knew about the existence of the perfmon patches, but they
> > were always in the vague RFC category and never directly submitted or
> > Cc:-ed to us.
>
> So at least now we have your attention. :)
>
> The best thing now might be for Stephane to do a patch set with the
> perfmon3 core + powerpc bits. I'd be happy to take that through my
> tree, and I really want to see perfmon3 get upstream. X86 can
> follow whenever you can get some time to take a look at it.
Sounds sensible. x86 doesnt always have to be the guinea pig for new
kernel features :)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 10:03 linux-next: manual merge of the perfmon3 tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 14:40 ` stephane eranian
2008-11-25 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 16:36 ` stephane eranian
2008-11-25 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 3:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26 3:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 7:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-11-26 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-26 8:32 ` stephane eranian
2008-11-26 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 9:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-26 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-26 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 10:39 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-25 15:19 ` stephane eranian
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-26 4:24 H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-25 10:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 8:42 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126071650.GE26036@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello$(echo .)nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=eranian@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=heukelum@mailshack$(echo .)com \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox