From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions•net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg•org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:48:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081208144851.c02cc7da.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 563 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
arch/sparc64/kernel/idprom.c between commit
a88b5ba8bd8ac18aad65ee6c6a254e2e74876db3 (sparc,sparc64: unify kernel/"")
from the sparc tree and commit 7c510e4b730a92cecf94ada45c989d8be0200d47
("net: convert more to %pM") from the net tree.
The former renamed the file while the latter modified it. I just deleted
the renamed file for now, the %pM conversion can be done later.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-08 3:48 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2008-12-08 7:26 ` linux-next: manual merge of the net tree David Miller
2008-12-29 3:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 4:00 ` David Miller
2008-12-29 4:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-23 23:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-24 2:15 ` David Miller
2008-12-24 14:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-23 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-24 2:16 ` David Miller
2008-12-15 3:44 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-15 6:59 ` David Miller
2008-12-09 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09 22:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-09 23:22 ` David Miller
2008-12-09 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-09 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-01 3:26 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-01 7:20 ` David Miller
2008-12-01 17:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-01 3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-27 3:40 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-27 8:03 ` David Miller
2008-11-26 6:42 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26 6:34 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21 2:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21 2:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21 4:11 ` David Miller
2008-11-21 4:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-20 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-18 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-12 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-12 3:07 ` John W. Linville
2008-11-10 3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-11 7:00 ` David Miller
2008-11-11 8:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-11 9:21 ` David Miller
2008-11-11 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-07 4:47 ` David Miller
2008-10-29 3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-29 4:53 ` David Miller
2008-10-29 12:34 ` John W. Linville
2008-10-29 20:20 ` David Miller
2008-08-28 3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-28 8:15 ` David Miller
2008-07-16 7:00 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-16 6:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-10 4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-10 12:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-08 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-08 6:03 ` Tobias Diedrich
2008-07-08 14:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-08 4:16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-08 12:22 ` John W. Linville
2008-07-08 13:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-08 4:10 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-08 5:14 ` David Miller
2008-07-08 5:44 ` David Miller
2008-07-08 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 4:14 ` David Miller
2008-07-03 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 4:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-03 4:13 ` David Miller
2008-07-01 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 9:33 ` David Miller
2008-07-01 15:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 7:11 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-19 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-19 5:01 ` David Miller
2008-06-19 5:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13 21:56 linux-next: pending wireless/wireless-current merge conflict John W. Linville
2008-06-25 18:04 ` John W. Linville
2008-06-26 5:40 ` linux-next: manual merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-26 5:54 ` David Miller
2008-06-26 6:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-26 9:08 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081208144851.c02cc7da.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions$(echo .)net \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox