Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)

From: Dave Chinner <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:39:38 +1100

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 04:14:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> fs/inode.c and mm/filemap.c need kernel-doc fixes.
> 
> What tree were these merged into for linux-next?

The fs/inode.c one ended up going through the XFS tree because
of the XFs code dependent on it....

> How do I get these doc fixes merged?  (2 patches below)

Perhaps best to go through the VFS tree for fs/inode.c changes.

> ---
> 
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
> 
> Fix fs/inode.c kernel-doc function parameters:
> 
> Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:120): No description found for parameter 'sb'
> Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:120): No description found for parameter 'inode'
> Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:588): No description found for parameter 'sb'
> Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:588): No description found for parameter 'inode'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
> cc: Dave Chinner <[email-masked]>

Looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <[email-masked]>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
[email-masked]