Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)

From: Rusty Russell <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:48:31 +1030

On Friday 09 January 2009 08:53:22 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> (Forward to Rusty)
> 
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:23:55 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20090107:
> > > 
> > > Undropped tree:
> > > 	rr
> > > 
> > > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > > 	ocfs2 (build problem)
> > > 	cpu_alloc (build problem)
> > 
> > 
> > When CONFIG_SMP=n, both arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h and
> > include/asm-generic/percpu.h define both of
> > read_percpu_ptr() and read_percpu_var().

Erk... this header is a bit of a mess of 64bit/32bit UP/SMP defines.

I've thwacked it harder, thanks!
Rusty.