Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)

From: Al Viro <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:29:25 +0000

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:55:12AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20090209:
> > 
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > 	audit (difficult conflicts)
> 
> 
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?

Everything in the public audit tree is applied, AFAICT (and for-{linus,next}
is reset to current mainline HEAD to avoid the conflicts; sorry about
that).