Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (slob)

From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:49:36 -0700

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:29:02 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:32:00 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > >
> > > mm/slob.c:480: error: 'flags' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > 
> > > pseudo-patch:
> > > 
> > > s/flags/gfp/
> > 
> > Caused by commit cf40bd16fdad42c053040bcd3988f5fdedbb6c57 ("lockdep:
> > annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS)") from the tracing tree.
> > 
> > Now fixed in the tip tree.
> 
> Note this has been broken for a relatively long time and only 
> got fixed when i noticed that randconfig was not as random as it 
> was supposed to be. That's how it started triggering in 
> linux-next too i suspect.

linux-next of 20090318 still has this build error.
Is the fix in some branch that is not merged into linux-next?

Thanks,
---
~Randy