public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah•com>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux•intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:00:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430010057.d5a98bf9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429141519.GA3112@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:15:19 -0700 Greg KH <greg@kroah•com> wrote:
>
> They were all posted on the linux-usb mailing list, as they are a new
> USB controller (for USB 3.0), so they didn't need to be sent to lkml.
> 
> But yes, the code does still need work, that is known, but a build
> failure wasn't known :)

This is what I tell maintainers of new trees being integrated into
linux-next:

"all patches/commits in the tree/series must have been:

	posted to a relevant mailing list
	reviewed
	unit tested
	destined for the next merge window (or the current release)

*before* they are included.  The linux-next tree is for integration
testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the
next merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary."

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-29  7:17 linux-next: usb tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 14:15 ` Greg KH
2009-04-29 15:00   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2009-04-29 15:16     ` Greg KH
2009-04-29 15:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-29 15:37   ` Greg KH
2009-04-29 15:44     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-29 17:44       ` Greg KH
2009-04-29 17:53         ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-30 16:13           ` Greg KH
2009-04-30 16:27             ` Randy Dunlap
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-02  6:10 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-02 13:53 ` Greg KH
2010-02-02 22:33   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-19  8:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-19 13:52 ` Greg KH
2009-08-19 23:45   ` Greg KH
2009-08-19 23:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22  1:31 ` Greg KH
2008-12-22  2:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-22  6:45     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-22 17:26       ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-12-22 17:53         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-22 23:37           ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-12-23  4:31             ` Greg KH
2008-12-23  4:30           ` Greg KH
2008-12-23  4:31         ` Greg KH
2008-12-23 10:26           ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-12-23 17:17             ` Greg KH
2008-12-24  1:07               ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2009-01-05  4:34                 ` Greg KH
2009-01-05  5:55                   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29  3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-02  7:27   ` Greg KH
2009-01-03  4:33     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03  0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-05  4:47 ` Greg KH
2008-11-05 18:19   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-10-14  4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-14  5:51 ` Alexey Klimov
2008-10-14 17:41   ` Alexey Klimov
2008-10-14 17:26     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-10-14  3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-14  8:24 ` Dmitry
2008-10-14 15:42   ` Dmitry
2008-10-16 16:05 ` Greg KH
2008-10-16 17:27   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2008-10-16 21:36   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2008-10-17  0:26     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-17  0:41       ` Dmitry
2008-10-20 18:45         ` Greg KH
2008-08-13  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13  7:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 14:23   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-14  6:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-14  6:54       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-14 12:25         ` Greg KH
2008-08-15  0:16           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  1:31 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090430010057.d5a98bf9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=greg@kroah$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox