Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:17:13 +1000

Hi Jens,

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:38:46 +0200 Jens Axboe <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> That is correct! I have just now updated for-next as well, so your next
> pull should lose this fixup.

Except you left the call to wakeup_pdflush(0) in there ...  I will fix
that up while Christoph's concerns are addressed.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/