Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:55:46 +1000

Hi Guys,

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930 Rusty Russell <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Rusty,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > 
> > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0':
> > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'

Still getting this ...

> > Here's a patch to fix this.  Since Linus' tree still contains instances
> > of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr
> > tree?

Since set_cpus_allowed_ptr() aleeady exists in Linus' tree, you could put
that patch in your tree, Bjorn.

> Yep, my series removes it, at least for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.

So one of you (at least) should apply that patch to your tree!  Please?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/