Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with the arm tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:03:55 +1000

Hi Russell,

On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:47:00 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security-testing tree got a conflicts in
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c between commit
> 369842658a36bcea28ecb643ba4bdb53919330dd ("ARM: 5677/1: ARM support for
> TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK/pselect6/ppoll/epoll_pwait") from the arm tree and
> commits d0420c83f39f79afb82010c2d2cafd150eef651b ("KEYS: Extend
> TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #6]") and
> ee18d64c1f632043a02e6f5ba5e045bb26a5465f ("KEYS: Add a keyctl to install
> a process's session keyring on its parent [try #6]") from the
> security-testing tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

This is now a conflict between the arm tree and Linus' tree (as the
security-testing tree has been merged).

> diff --cc arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> index f7194e4,ea4ad3a..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@@ -694,5 -706,12 +694,12 @@@ asmlinkage voi
>   do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall)
>   {
>   	if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
>  -		do_signal(&current->blocked, regs, syscall);
>  +		do_signal(regs, syscall);
> + 
> + 	if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> + 		clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> + 		tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> + 		if (current->replacement_session_keyring)
> + 			key_replace_session_keyring();
> + 	}
>   }
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/