Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi/processor.h)

From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:12 -0800

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20091111:
> 
> The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree.

when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n:

arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit':
(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit'
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here

The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline"
at line 323.

---
~Randy