public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation•org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs•helsinki.fi>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the slab tree
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:43:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091201174349.f72f36bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in mm/slab.c
between commit ce79ddc8e2376a9a93c7d42daf89bfcbb9187e62 ("SLAB: Fix
lockdep annotations for CPU hotplug") from the slab tree and commit
1871e52c76dd95895caeb772f845a1718dcbcd75 ("percpu: make percpu symbols
under kernel/ and mm/ unique") from the percpu tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au

diff --cc mm/slab.c
index 6ad48a7,211b174..0000000
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@@ -697,7 -665,27 +697,7 @@@ static inline void init_lock_keys(void
  static DEFINE_MUTEX(cache_chain_mutex);
  static struct list_head cache_chain;
  
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct delayed_work, reap_work);
 -/*
 - * chicken and egg problem: delay the per-cpu array allocation
 - * until the general caches are up.
 - */
 -static enum {
 -	NONE,
 -	PARTIAL_AC,
 -	PARTIAL_L3,
 -	EARLY,
 -	FULL
 -} g_cpucache_up;
 -
 -/*
 - * used by boot code to determine if it can use slab based allocator
 - */
 -int slab_is_available(void)
 -{
 -	return g_cpucache_up >= EARLY;
 -}
 -
+ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct delayed_work, slab_reap_work);
  
  static inline struct array_cache *cpu_cache_get(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
  {

             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-01  6:43 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2009-12-01  6:46 ` linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the slab tree Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091201174349.f72f36bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs$(echo .)helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox