From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV•linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst•de>,
"\"Jörn Engel\"" <joern@logfs•org>
Subject: linux-next: vfs tree build warning
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:11:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100118131128.a09d1021.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next build (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
fs/logfs/inode.c:399: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
Introduced by commit bc39e28236344af617473df80abb7de43176511e ("pass
writeback_control to ->write_inode") from the vfs tree interacting with
commit 5db53f3e80dee2d9dff5e534f9e9fe1db17c9936 ("[LogFS] add new flash
file system") from the logfs tree.
This will need a fixup patch (see below) which I can carry in the
linux-next tree. There may, of course, be a better fix (which I can
carry if someone sends it to me).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:14:59 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] logfs: fixup for write_inode API change
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
---
fs/logfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/logfs/inode.c b/fs/logfs/inode.c
index 6d08b37..36308af 100644
--- a/fs/logfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/logfs/inode.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "logfs.h"
#include <linux/writeback.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
+#include <linux/writeback.h>
/*
* How soon to reuse old inode numbers? LogFS doesn't store deleted inodes
@@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ struct inode *logfs_read_meta_inode(struct super_block *sb, u64 ino)
return inode;
}
-static int logfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
+static int logfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
int ret;
long flags = WF_LOCK;
--
1.6.6
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 2:11 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2010-01-18 14:34 ` linux-next: vfs tree build warning Jörn Engel
2010-01-18 23:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-18 2:11 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-18 4:34 ` Sage Weil
2010-01-18 5:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-18 6:01 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100118131128.a09d1021.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=hch@lst$(echo .)de \
--cc=joern@logfs$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox