From: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach•org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver•com>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:38:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003111138.12070.br1@einfach.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100311131500.1057b6c5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thursday 11 March 2010 11:15:00 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c between commit
> 86415d43efd4f7093979cfa8a80232114266f1a4 ("ath5k: fix I/Q calibration
> (for real)") from the wireless-current tree and commit
> 49a85d211a63ad1d565842ebc535c5168d85d86a ("ath5k: IQ calibration for
> AR5211 is slightly different") from the wireless tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
not sure what happened...
but wireless-next-2.6.git 86415d43efd4f7093979cfa8a80232114266f1a4 is an older
version of my patch. i have sent one which applies cleanly later on.
your fix is correct, though.
bruno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 2:15 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-11 2:38 ` Bruno Randolf [this message]
2010-03-11 3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-28 3:19 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-28 9:10 ` Jouni Malinen
2011-09-14 3:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-21 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-21 18:05 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-04-05 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-05 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-09 1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 14:44 ` John W. Linville
2010-04-07 15:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 23:19 ` David Miller
2010-04-01 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-01 11:43 ` John W. Linville
2010-02-23 1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 15:05 ` John W. Linville
2009-07-09 1:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22 1:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22 18:23 ` reinette chatre
2009-04-22 18:38 ` John W. Linville
2009-02-19 5:27 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003111138.12070.br1@einfach.org \
--to=br1@einfach$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver$(echo .)com \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox