Subject: Re: linux-next: Fix AppArmor build warnings after merge of the security-testing tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:00:47 +1000

Hi again,

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:56:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:40:31 -0700 John Johansen <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > From: John Johansen <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:31:57 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] AppArmor: Fix build warnings from linux-next merge
> > 
> > Patch AppArmor to fix build warnings for changes that exist in the
> > linux-next tree.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email-masked]>
> 	.
> 	.
> > diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> > index d5666d3..f56978a 100644
> > --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> > +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> > @@ -607,9 +607,11 @@ static int apparmor_setprocattr(struct task_struct *task, char *name,
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int apparmor_task_setrlimit(unsigned int resource,
> > +static int apparmor_task_setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > +				   unsigned int resource,
> >  				   struct rlimit *new_rlim)
> >  {
> > +	/* Use current profile instead of profile on @tsk */
> >  	struct aa_profile *profile = aa_current_profile();
> >  	int error = 0;
> 
> This last change seems to have been lost along the way.

Sorry, my mistake, this change is sitting in the security-testing tree in
linux-next still.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/