From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99•com>
Cc: Sundar R IYER <sundar.iyer@stericsson•com>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@stericsson•com>,
Russell King <rmk@arm•linux.org.uk>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FW: next build fails
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:52:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917075242.e0bc4b54.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284656407.2411.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:00:07 -0700 Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99•com> wrote:
>
> __v7_ca9mp_proc_info should just duplicate __v7_proc_info (the one below
> it) ..
Do you mean this:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:48:25 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix build failure for legacy PMD_FLAGS
[Updated with advice from Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99•com>: sfr]
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson•com>
Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@stericsson•com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 10 ++++++++--
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
index 820f6ba..fc8828b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
@@ -334,10 +334,16 @@ cpu_elf_name:
__v7_ca9mp_proc_info:
.long 0x410fc090 @ Required ID value
.long 0xff0ffff0 @ Mask for ID
- .long PMD_TYPE_SECT | \
+ ALT_SMP(.long \
+ PMD_TYPE_SECT | \
PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \
PMD_SECT_AP_READ | \
- PMD_FLAGS
+ PMD_FLAGS_SMP)
+ ALT_UP(.long \
+ PMD_TYPE_SECT | \
+ PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \
+ PMD_SECT_AP_READ | \
+ PMD_FLAGS_UP)
.long PMD_TYPE_SECT | \
PMD_SECT_XN | \
PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \
--
1.7.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <33A307AF30D7BF4F811B1568FE7A9B18043784FF99@EXDCVYMBSTM006.EQ1STM.local>
2010-09-16 6:44 ` FW: next build fails Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 17:00 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-16 21:52 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2010-09-16 21:58 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-16 22:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 22:08 ` Daniel Walker
2010-09-17 10:35 ` Russell King
2010-09-17 15:44 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100917075242.e0bc4b54.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99$(echo .)com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=sundar.iyer@stericsson$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox