Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 4

From: Greg KH <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:11:52 -0700

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:59:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> On Mon, October 4, 2010 10:48 pm, Zimny Lech wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > 2010/10/4 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >> This tree is not as well tested as others since it was only built after
> >>  all the merges had been done.
> >
> > Randy said that he had already sent a patch for this
> >
> >
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function
> > 'get_device_parent':
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:634:3: error: 'block_class'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:634:3: note: each undeclared
> > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function
> > 'device_add_class_symlinks':
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:723:2: error: 'block_class'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function
> > 'device_remove_class_symlinks':
> > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:751:2: error: 'block_class'
> > undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [drivers/base/core.o]
> > Error 1
> > make[2]: *** [drivers/base] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
> > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> 
> 
> I sure did, but Greg may be backlogged or just ignoring it.

backlogged, I was in Tokyo last week, catching up now...

thanks,

greg k-h