Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:56:44 +1100

Hi again,

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:48:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c between commit
> cf9efce0ce3136fa076f53e53154e98455229514 ("powerpc: Account time using
> timebase rather than PURR") from the powerpc tree and commit
> e360adbe29241a0194e10e20595360dd7b98a2b3 ("irq_work: Add generic hardirq
> context callbacks") from the tip tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up and can carry the fix as necessary.

I forgot the merge diff, sorry:

diff --cc arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 644f918,54888eb..0000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@@ -578,9 -585,11 +578,9 @@@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * r
  	old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
  	irq_enter();
  
- 	if (test_perf_event_pending()) {
- 		clear_perf_event_pending();
- 		perf_event_do_pending();
 -	calculate_steal_time();
 -
+ 	if (test_irq_work_pending()) {
+ 		clear_irq_work_pending();
+ 		irq_work_run();
  	}
  
  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]