From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat•com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:32:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101210133212.70844480.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 638 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c between commit
5f2b0ba4d94b3ac23cbc4b7f675d98eb677a760a ("x86, nmi_watchdog: Remove the
old nmi_watchdog") from the tip tree and commits
aa0be2afeed15edd653830ca87a3f173f08c23e6 ("x86: Use this_cpu_ops to
optimize code") and e5195e91d9b579ba9def00ea2e8b96189c0120f4 ("x86: Use
this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter") from the percpu tree.
I just ignored the percpu changes to this file and removed it as the tip
tree did.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 2:32 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-09 4:50 linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-09 13:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-10-09 13:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-10-09 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-16 7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16 13:40 ` Alex Shi
2011-04-20 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-11 3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-11 9:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-05 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-31 2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-31 11:17 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-31 2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-03 5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-03 22:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-14 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11 7:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-03 9:11 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-06 5:06 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101210133212.70844480.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox