Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs)

From: David Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:00:31 -0800 (PST)

From: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Hi all,
>> > > 
>> > > Changes since 20110121:
>> > > 
>> > > The net tree lost its build failure.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled:
>> > 
>> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int'
>> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>> 
>> Thanks, I'm looking into it.
> 
> On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case
> where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled?

Yes.