Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the acpi tree

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:29:52 +0100

On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c between commit
> a69fa313606a51cee99d802c14895330948f60c8 ("ACPI / PM: Drop
> acpi_restore_state_mem()") from the acpi tree and commit
> d1ee433539ea5963a8f946f3428b335d1c5fdb20 ("x86, trampoline: Use the
> unified trampoline setup for ACPI wakeup") from the tip tree.
> 
> Just context (I think).

Yes.  The ACPI tree renames a function that the x86 tree modifies.

> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Please do, thanks!