Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:38:26 +1000

Hi Phillip,

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> > squashfs
> 
> This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
> linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
> 
> Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
> 
> $ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
> ...
> 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
> 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
> 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
> 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
> 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
> 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
> 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4

plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)):

$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l
6

It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset
of trees to look at.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/