Subject: Re: Temporary -rcu tree location

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:06:47 -0700

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:07:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > > there doesn't seem to be 'rcu/next' branch, right?
> > 
> > No, there is not.  So the idea is to push "rcu/next" the first time,
> > then ":rcu/next" thereafter?
> 
> Can't you just do a (forced) push over and over again without removing
> the branch each time?

I will give it a try on the next update.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul