Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:52:53 +1100

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c between commit 28af690a284d ("ARM: gic, local
timers: use the request_percpu_irq() interface") from the arm tree and
commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
from the arm-soc tree.

I hacked it up (probably incorrectly - see below and dropping the
local_timer_ack() change from the latter, since the former removed that
function).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
index 582b874,eb182f2..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
@@@ -384,15 -400,17 +400,19 @@@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_init(struc
  
  	exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mct_tick[cpu].base + MCT_L_TCNTB_OFFSET);
  
- 	if (cpu == 0) {
- 		mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
- 		evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L0;
- 		setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L0, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
+ 	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI) {
+ 		if (cpu == 0) {
+ 			mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
++			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L0;
+ 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L0, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
+ 		} else {
+ 			mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
++			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L1;
+ 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L1, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
+ 			irq_set_affinity(IRQ_MCT_L1, cpumask_of(1));
+ 		}
  	} else {
- 		mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
- 		evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L1;
- 		setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L1, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
- 		irq_set_affinity(IRQ_MCT_L1, cpumask_of(1));
+ 		gic_enable_ppi(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER);
  	}
  }