From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail•com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:11:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111214181131.GG10791@somewhere.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111214100851.2ead3872.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:08:51AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:16:31 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail•com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > cgroups: new cancel_attach_task() subsystem callback
> > > cgroups: ability to stop res charge propagation on bounded ancestor
> > > cgroups: add res counter common ancestor searching
> > > res_counter: allow charge failure pointer to be null
> > > cgroups: pull up res counter charge failure interpretation to caller
> > > cgroups: allow subsystems to cancel a fork
> > > cgroups: add a task counter subsystem
> > > cgroups: ERR_PTR needs err.h
> > > cgroup: Fix task counter common ancestor logic
> > > cgroup-fix-task-counter-common-ancestor-logic-checkpatch-fixes
> > >
> > > I am wondering if that patch set should be included in the cgroup tree?
> >
> > That would be probably the easier solution.
> > Andrew, do you mind if I rebase these patches and target them to Tejun's
> > tree instead?
>
> Sure, that works, I'll drop them.
Cool.
> > We can keep them on a standalone branch there based on Tejuns until
> > we reach an agreement on their upstreamability.
>
> I wondered what had been happening with that discussion. I guess we
> need to restart it.
>
Dan J Walsh and Daniel Berrange who work on lxc and for whom I'm primarily
working on this feature have added their point of view. You might want to
have a look.
I can post something that synthetize everybody's words.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 6:51 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-14 16:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-14 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-14 18:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-06 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-06 4:58 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-21 7:13 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111214181131.GG10791@somewhere.redhat.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox