Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree

From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:24:09 +0100

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:25:47 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email-masked]> wrote:

> 
> * Ingo Molnar <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > > All of it including "[S390] cputime: add sparse checking and 
> > > cleanup" or just the fix for uptime ?
> > 
> > I suspect we can take it all if it's all scheduling/time 
> > related, and add new patches to sched/core to keep it all 
> > concentrated in a single tree?
> 
> Btw., i'd suggest to keep your commits as-is and merge 
> tip:sched/core into your tree - and send the result to me so 
> that we can make that the new sched/core.
> 
> That way your commits are preserved and the conflicts are 
> resolved.

Just did that and pushed out the result on 

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git cputime-tip

Pulling either the original tip sched/core branch or the cputime-tip branch
to an up-to-date repository fails by the way, it gives a conflict in
kernel/sched/fair.c.
And then there is the thing with cpustat being u64. It really should be
cputime64_t. How do you want that resolved, I assume an additional patch
on top?

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.