Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:18:16 +0100

Hi Stephen,

On Tuesday, January 24, 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20120123:
> 
> New tree: ktest
> Reinstated tree: input-mt
> 
> My fixes tree contains:
> 	powerpc: make PSERIES_IDLE bool
> 
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
> 
> The arm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> 
> The arm-soc tree lost its conflicts but gained another against the arm
> tree.
> 
> The s5p tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
> 
> The nfs tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The input tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120123.
> 
> The akpm tree lost several patches that were merged into Linus' tree.

Is there any new material touching kernel/workqueue.c or kernel/freezer.c?

We seem to have a freezer regression in linux-next which doesn't seem to be
present in my tree.

Thanks,
Rafael