public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix•de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom•net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro•org>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd•com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:54:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207121554.03240.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712131231.GH2194@pengutronix.de>

On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > Please check this and talk to each other ...
> 
> I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate
> patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd
> really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me.
> They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually
> questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be
> useful for a number of drivers.
> 
> Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd
> prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to
> support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you
> think?

I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one
to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with
the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better
to do this the proper way now.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-10  6:41 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10  6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10  8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 15:54   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-07-13 11:03     ` Lee Jones
     [not found]   ` <20120712131231.GH2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14 21:34     ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17       ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31         ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00           ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:55             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06           ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30             ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35               ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02                 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22                   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52                     ` Lee Jones
     [not found]                       ` <50057C1A.80606-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:20                         ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18  5:33                           ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18  9:59                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33                                 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:43                                   ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18  7:35                           ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12                             ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24                               ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37         ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35           ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]             ` <20120716123550.GE17435-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 19:45               ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]                 ` <CACRpkdaMB-n7XYcxE8QtAm-WrGc2DR0krfTjQZCbvOL1HYep1Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 20:04                   ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10             ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-19  5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13  6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13  7:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-11-15  5:27 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207121554.03240.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom$(echo .)net \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox