Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:35:16 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c between commit 7f8436a1269e ("l2tp: fix return
value check") from the net tree and commit 15e473046cb6 ("netlink: Rename
pid to portid to avoid confusion") from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]

diff --cc net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
index 6f93635,6ec3f67..0000000
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
@@@ -78,10 -78,10 +78,10 @@@ static int l2tp_nl_cmd_noop(struct sk_b
  		goto out;
  	}
  
- 	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_pid, info->snd_seq,
+ 	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
  			  &l2tp_nl_family, 0, L2TP_CMD_NOOP);
 -	if (IS_ERR(hdr)) {
 -		ret = PTR_ERR(hdr);
 +	if (!hdr) {
 +		ret = -EMSGSIZE;
  		goto err_out;
  	}
  
@@@ -248,10 -248,10 +248,10 @@@ static int l2tp_nl_tunnel_send(struct s
  	struct l2tp_stats stats;
  	unsigned int start;
  
- 	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, &l2tp_nl_family, flags,
+ 	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, &l2tp_nl_family, flags,
  			  L2TP_CMD_TUNNEL_GET);
 -	if (IS_ERR(hdr))
 -		return PTR_ERR(hdr);
 +	if (!hdr)
 +		return -EMSGSIZE;
  
  	if (nla_put_u8(skb, L2TP_ATTR_PROTO_VERSION, tunnel->version) ||
  	    nla_put_u32(skb, L2TP_ATTR_CONN_ID, tunnel->tunnel_id) ||
@@@ -616,9 -616,9 +616,9 @@@ static int l2tp_nl_session_send(struct 
  
  	sk = tunnel->sock;
  
- 	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, &l2tp_nl_family, flags, L2TP_CMD_SESSION_GET);
+ 	hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, &l2tp_nl_family, flags, L2TP_CMD_SESSION_GET);
 -	if (IS_ERR(hdr))
 -		return PTR_ERR(hdr);
 +	if (!hdr)
 +		return -EMSGSIZE;
  
  	if (nla_put_u32(skb, L2TP_ATTR_CONN_ID, tunnel->tunnel_id) ||
  	    nla_put_u32(skb, L2TP_ATTR_SESSION_ID, session->session_id) ||