From: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux•org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>,
Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia•edu>, Greg KH <greg@kroah•com>,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom•net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the driver-core tree
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:59:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121129225927.GJ8628@kw.sim.vm.gnt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121129160309.7dc352f433d39f1bde0018a8@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3268 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:03:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> drivers/leds/leds-ns2.c between commit 98ea1ea20cb7 ("leds: remove use of
> __devinit") from the driver-core tree and commit 72052fcc1026 ("leds:
> leds-ns2: add device tree binding") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Hi Stephen,
The merge is fine and the driver works as expected.
Thanks.
Simon
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc drivers/leds/leds-ns2.c
> index bc6a0db,d64cc22..0000000
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ns2.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ns2.c
> @@@ -247,9 -260,67 +248,65 @@@ static void delete_ns2_led(struct ns2_l
> {
> device_remove_file(led_dat->cdev.dev, &dev_attr_sata);
> led_classdev_unregister(&led_dat->cdev);
> - gpio_free(led_dat->cmd);
> - gpio_free(led_dat->slow);
> }
>
> + #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> + /*
> + * Translate OpenFirmware node properties into platform_data.
> + */
> -static int __devinit
> ++static int
> + ns2_leds_get_of_pdata(struct device *dev, struct ns2_led_platform_data *pdata)
> + {
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + struct ns2_led *leds;
> + int num_leds = 0;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + num_leds = of_get_child_count(np);
> + if (!num_leds)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + leds = devm_kzalloc(dev, num_leds * sizeof(struct ns2_led),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!leds)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + const char *string;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_get_named_gpio(child, "cmd-gpio", 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + leds[i].cmd = ret;
> + ret = of_get_named_gpio(child, "slow-gpio", 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + leds[i].slow = ret;
> + ret = of_property_read_string(child, "label", &string);
> + leds[i].name = (ret == 0) ? string : child->name;
> + ret = of_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger",
> + &string);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + leds[i].default_trigger = string;
> +
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->leds = leds;
> + pdata->num_leds = num_leds;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + static const struct of_device_id of_ns2_leds_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "lacie,ns2-leds", },
> + {},
> + };
> + #endif /* CONFIG_OF_GPIO */
> +
> -static int __devinit ns2_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int ns2_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct ns2_led_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> struct ns2_led_data *leds_data;
> @@@ -296,10 -381,11 +367,11 @@@ static int ns2_led_remove(struct platfo
>
> static struct platform_driver ns2_led_driver = {
> .probe = ns2_led_probe,
> - .remove = __devexit_p(ns2_led_remove),
> + .remove = ns2_led_remove,
> .driver = {
> - .name = "leds-ns2",
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .name = "leds-ns2",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_ns2_leds_match),
> },
> };
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-29 5:03 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the driver-core tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 5:17 ` Greg KH
2012-11-29 22:59 ` Simon Guinot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121129225927.GJ8628@kw.sim.vm.gnt \
--to=simon.guinot@sequanux$(echo .)org \
--cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
--cc=greg@kroah$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom$(echo .)net \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=wfp5p@virginia$(echo .)edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox