public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat•com>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dlm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:27:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130817102734.GA12640@rothwell.emu.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130816150441.GA20568@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 903 bytes --]

Hi David,

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:04:41AM -0400, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:40:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the dlm tree got a conflict in fs/dlm/user.c
> > between commit 201d3dfa4da1 ("dlm: kill the unnecessary and wrong
> > device_close()->recalc_sigpending()") from Linus' tree and commit
> > c6ca7bc91d51 ("dlm: remove signal blocking") from the dlm tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (the latter is a superset of the former, so I just used it)
> > and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
> 
> Thanks, what's the procedure to get the right thing merged in the end?
> Apply Oleg's patch to my tree followed by my own?

Just leave it alone, Linus will do what I did when he merges the dlm
tree during the next merge window (or whenever he is asked to merge it).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-17 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16  1:40 linux-next: manual merge of the dlm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-16 15:04 ` David Teigland
2013-08-17 10:27   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130817102734.GA12640@rothwell.emu.id.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox