Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:20:03 +1000

Hi Kukjin,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c between commit 46bfc99c9225 ("ARM: l2c:
exynos: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation (and thereby fix it)")
from the arm tree and commit 3919fb954b3a ("ARM: EXYNOS: Remove
exynos_subsys registration") from the samsung tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index afce154f83f9,93507ee98c86..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@@ -241,17 -246,22 +243,6 @@@ void __init exynos_init_io(void
  	exynos_map_io();
  }
  
- struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
- 	.name		= "exynos-core",
- 	.dev_name	= "exynos-core",
- };
- 
- static int __init exynos_core_init(void)
 -static int __init exynos4_l2x0_cache_init(void)
--{
- 	return subsys_system_register(&exynos_subsys, NULL);
 -	int ret;
 -
 -	ret = l2x0_of_init(L2_AUX_VAL, L2_AUX_MASK);
 -	if (ret)
 -		return ret;
 -
 -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_S5P_SLEEP)) {
 -		l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs);
 -		clean_dcache_area(&l2x0_regs_phys, sizeof(unsigned long));
 -	}
 -	return 0;
--}
- core_initcall(exynos_core_init);
 -early_initcall(exynos4_l2x0_cache_init);
--
  static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
  {
  	struct device_node *i2c_np;