From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google•com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel•com>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@lip6•fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci-current tree
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:10:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140814131031.4ecce959@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3460 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c between commit
9baa3c34ac4e ("PCI: Remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use") from the
pci-current tree and commits 92807ffdf32c ("perf/x86/uncore: Move
NHM/SNB/IVB specific code to seperate file") and 8268fdfc45b7
("perf/x86/uncore: Move SNB/IVB-EP specific code to seperate file")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I used the latter version of this file and applied the
following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
action is required).
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:07:52 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: fix for DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE removal
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
index 6e7811f3ea73..e0e934c8ee77 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *snb_pci_uncores[] = {
NULL,
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(snb_uncore_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id snb_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
{ /* IMC */
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SNB_IMC),
.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(SNB_PCI_UNCORE_IMC, 0),
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(snb_uncore_pci_ids) = {
{ /* end: all zeroes */ },
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ivb_uncore_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id ivb_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
{ /* IMC */
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IVB_IMC),
.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(SNB_PCI_UNCORE_IMC, 0),
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ivb_uncore_pci_ids) = {
{ /* end: all zeroes */ },
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(hsw_uncore_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id hsw_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
{ /* IMC */
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HSW_IMC),
.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(SNB_PCI_UNCORE_IMC, 0),
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
index d3e9c55d984a..6606ed05d311 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *snbep_pci_uncores[] = {
NULL,
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(snbep_uncore_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id snbep_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
{ /* Home Agent */
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_UNC_HA),
.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(SNBEP_PCI_UNCORE_HA, 0),
@@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *ivbep_pci_uncores[] = {
NULL,
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ivbep_uncore_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id ivbep_uncore_pci_ids[] = {
{ /* Home Agent 0 */
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0xe30),
.driver_data = UNCORE_PCI_DEV_DATA(IVBEP_PCI_UNCORE_HA, 0),
--
2.1.0.rc1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-14 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-14 3:10 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2014-08-14 3:22 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci-current tree Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140814131031.4ecce959@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=benoit.taine@lip6$(echo .)fr \
--cc=bhelgaas@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox