Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1

From: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:48:33 +0900

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:14AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Tejun, Christoph,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:11:23AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Subject: irqchip: Properly fetch the per cpu offset
> > > 
> > > The raw_cpu_read() conversion dropped the fetch of the offset
> > > from base->percpu_base in gic_get_percpu_base.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email-masked]>
> > > 
> > > Index: linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > > +++ linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> > >  static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> > >  {
> > > -	return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base);
> > > +	return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base);
> > 
> > I suppose this should go through percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops?  Can
> > we please cc irq folks and get acks?
> 
> Could Thomas and I get a pointer to the original patch and thread that
> caused the error?

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1769201/focus=1769204
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/32601/focus=32606

Thanks.

-- 
tejun