From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation•org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de•ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de•ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the s390 tree
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:46:29 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007164629.38d68eff@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1339 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c between commit 4dc0f1e9c0a9 ("s390/idle:
consolidate idle functions and definitions") from the s390 tree and
commit eb7e7d766326 ("s390: Replace __get_cpu_var uses") from the
percpu tree.
I fixed it up (the former moved the code modified by the latter into a
new file, so I just removed the code and added the patch below) and can
carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:44:38 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] s390: fixup for Replace __get_cpu_var uses
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
---
arch/s390/kernel/idle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/idle.c b/arch/s390/kernel/idle.c
index c75fbae1e37e..9d19a91dc6a6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/idle.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/idle.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct s390_idle_data, s390_idle);
void __kprobes enabled_wait(void)
{
- struct s390_idle_data *idle = &__get_cpu_var(s390_idle);
+ struct s390_idle_data *idle = this_cpu_ptr(&s390_idle);
unsigned long long idle_time;
unsigned long psw_mask;
--
2.1.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 5:46 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-07 5:37 linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the s390 tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-07 5:34 Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-07 5:31 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141007164629.38d68eff@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox