Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the sound-asoc tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:51:42 +1100

Hi Greg,

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:38:53 +0900 Greg KH <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:31:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> > sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c between commit 2e4f75919e5a ("ASoC:
> > Intel: Add PM support to HSW/BDW PCM driver") from the sound-asoc tree
> > and commit 3c1af8802e45 ("ASoC: intel: drop owner assignment from
> > platform_drivers") from the driver-core tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
> > 
> > diff --cc sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > index 7eb9afc9b33d,ad21e636edc6..000000000000
> > --- a/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > @@@ -1173,9 -899,6 +1173,8 @@@ static const struct dev_pm_ops hsw_pcm_
> >   static struct platform_driver hsw_pcm_driver = {
> >   	.driver = {
> >   		.name = "haswell-pcm-audio",
> > - 		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >  +		.pm = &hsw_pcm_pm,
> >  +
> >   	},
> >   
> >   	.probe = hsw_pcm_dev_probe,
> 
> 
> Fix looks good, thanks.

I assume that there was a good reason not to farm these patches out to
their respective maintainers?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]