Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:34:42 +1000

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c between commit 21c3ea18819b ("xfs: unlock i_mutex in
xfs_break_layouts") from the xfs tree and commit 5dd3dc06371a ("VFS:
normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations") from the vfs
tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]

diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 2f1839e4dd1b,54b95232d946..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@@ -953,13 -975,9 +953,13 @@@ xfs_vn_setattr
  		uint		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
  
  		xfs_ilock(ip, iolock);
- 		error = xfs_break_layouts(dentry->d_inode, &iolock, true);
 -		error = xfs_break_layouts(d_inode(dentry), &iolock);
 -		if (!error)
++		error = xfs_break_layouts(d_inode(dentry), &iolock, true);
 +		if (!error) {
 +			xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
 +			iolock |= XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
 +
  			error = xfs_setattr_size(ip, iattr);
 +		}
  		xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
  	} else {
  		error = xfs_setattr_nonsize(ip, iattr, 0);