public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge•net.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter•org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Subject: Re: Request for inclusion of ipvs and ipvs-next trees in next
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:25:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151006002521.GA12506@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151005234054.1bfade21@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:40:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:56:26 +0900 Simon Horman <horms@verge•net.au> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to request the inclusion of 'ipvs.git' and 'ipvs-next.git' in
> > linux-next.
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs.git
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs-next.git
> > 
> > I have been maintaining IPVS using those trees for a number of years and
> > maintaining IPVS without those trees for a number of years before that.
> > 
> > Usually 'ipvs-next.git' feeds into Pablo's 'nf-next.git' which
> > in turn feeds into Dave's 'net-next.git'. Likewise for s/-next//.
> 
> Added from tomorrow.  (just noting that I don't fetch the nf{,-next}
> trees ...)

Thanks, noted.

> I am using the git:... version of the URLs and assume that you mean for me
> to fetch the master branch of each of those trees.

Sorry for not being clearer about the branch; yes, the master branch is
the one to fetch.

> Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
> you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
> linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
> conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 
> 
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
>      * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
>         Signed-off-by,
>      * posted to the relevant mailing list,
>      * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
>      * successfully unit tested, and 
>      * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
> 
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-06  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02  0:56 Request for inclusion of ipvs and ipvs-next trees in next Simon Horman
2015-10-05 12:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-06  0:25   ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151006002521.GA12506@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge$(echo .)net.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox