public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs•net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the tip tree
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:23:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151231202347.3090c74b@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi Michael,

Today's linux-next merge of the vhost tree got conflicts in:

  arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
  arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
  arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
  include/asm-generic/barrier.h

between commit:

  d5a73cadf3fd ("lcoking/barriers, arch: Use smp barriers in smp_store_release()")

from the tip tree and commit:

  2683de3a1732 ("ia64: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h")
  d78113bef3e0 ("powerpc: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h")
  25bc870c914b ("s390: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h")
  24888a057e97 ("asm-generic: add __smp_XXX wrappers")

from the vhost tree.

I fixed it up (in each case taking the vhost tree version) and can
carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

However, given the ongoing review and discussion, I do wonder if these
vhost tree commits should be in linux-next yet.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au

             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-31  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-31  9:23 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2015-12-31 10:25 ` linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the tip tree Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151231202347.3090c74b@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs$(echo .)net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=mst@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox