Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

From: Greg KH <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:57:25 -0700

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 01:49:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/brw_test.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lu_object.h
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_mmap.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw26.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_io.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_page.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/class_obd.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdecho/echo_client.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cache.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_request.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   09cbfeaf1a5a ("mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros")
>   ea1754a08476 ("mm, fs: remove remaining PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} usage")
> 
> from Linus' tree and lots of commits from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below the signature) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> I also added this merge fix patch:

Thanks for this, it should all now be resolved in my tree.

greg k-h