Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:13:47 +1000

Hi Joe,

On Mon, 29 May 2017 19:20:25 -0700 Joe Perches <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 19:14 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 06:54:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:  
> > > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 11:40 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >   
> > > > > On Mon, 29 May 2017 14:15:05 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anyone see any other options?  
> > > 
> > > My preferred option would be removing pr_fmt
> > > and adding a couple new macros.  
> > 
> > Not sure how to evaluate yours and Stephen's changes, but I reverted my
> > conversion to a macro based on the hope that something good will come
> > of this effort.  ;-)  
> 
> Stephen's suggestion makes the format and arguments
> have an apparent mismatch.  What I suggested hides
> the "module %s: ", mod->name bit in the macros (like
> the older pr_fmt use), allows anyone else to #define
> pr_fmt to taste, and keeps the format and arguments in
> agreement.

Yours is much better, mine was just a quick hack ... consider yours

Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell