public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel•org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel•org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb•com>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the net-next tree
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:26:28 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171113162618.1b33e82d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171009183836.cceczuqytzmgqubr@sirena.co.uk>

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:38:36 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel•org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cgroup tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   324bda9e6c5ad ("bpf: multi program support for cgroup+bpf")
> 
> from the net-next tree and commit:
> 
>   041cd640b2f3c ("cgroup: Implement cgroup2 basic CPU usage accounting")
> 
> from the cgroup tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> index 00f5b358aeac,c3421ee0d230..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> @@@ -4765,8 -4785,9 +4788,11 @@@ static struct cgroup *cgroup_create(str
>   
>   	return cgrp;
>   
>  +out_idr_free:
>  +	cgroup_idr_remove(&root->cgroup_idr, cgrp->id);
> + out_stat_exit:
> + 	if (cgroup_on_dfl(parent))
> + 		cgroup_stat_exit(cgrp);
>   out_cancel_ref:
>   	percpu_ref_exit(&cgrp->self.refcnt);
>   out_free_cgrp:

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-13  5:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-09 18:38 linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the net-next tree Mark Brown
2017-10-09 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-11-13  5:26 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-20  6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-31  8:10 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-12  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-26  4:31 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171113162618.1b33e82d@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=ast@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kafai@fb$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox